Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lio, P.
Right arrow Articles by Vannucci, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lio, P.
Right arrow Articles by Vannucci, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics Vol. 16 no. 4 2000
Pages 376-382
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Wavelet change-point prediction of transmembrane proteins

Pietro Lio 1,* and Marina Vannucci 2

1 Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK
2 Department of Statistics, Texas A & M University, USA

Received on July 23, 1999 ; revised on September 30, 1999 ; accepted on October 20, 1999

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Motivation: A non-parametric method, based on a wavelet data-dependent threshold technique for change-point analysis, is applied to predict location and topology of helices in transmembrane proteins. A new propensity scale generated from a transmembrane helix database is proposed.

Results: We show that wavelet change-point performs well for smoothing hydropathy and transmembrane profiles generated using different scales. We investigate which wavelet bases and threshold functions are overall most appropriate to detect transmembrane segments. Prediction accuracy is based on the analysis of two data sets used as standard benchmarks for transmembrane prediction algorithms. The analysis of a test set of 83 proteins results in accuracy per segment equal to 98.2%; the analysis of a 48 proteins blind-test set, i.e. containing proteins not used to generate the propensity scales, results in accuracy per segment equal to 97.4%. We believe that this method can also be applied to the detection of boundaries of other patterns such as G + Cisochores and dot-plots.

Availability: The transmembrane database, TMALN and source code are available upon request from the authors.

Contact: plio{at}hgmp.mrc.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
R. E. Thurman, N. Day, W. S. Noble, and J. A. Stamatoyannopoulos
Identification of higher-order functional domains in the human ENCODE regions
Genome Res., June 1, 2007; 17(6): 917 - 927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
P. Du, W. A. Kibbe, and S. M. Lin
Improved peak detection in mass spectrum by incorporating continuous wavelet transform-based pattern matching
Bioinformatics, September 1, 2006; 22(17): 2059 - 2065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
L. Marsh and C. S. Griffiths
Protein Structural Influences in Rhodopsin Evolution
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2005; 22(4): 894 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biophys. JHome page
K. A. Selz, A. J. Mandell, M. F. Shlesinger, V. Arcuragi, and M. J. Owens
Designing Human m1 Muscarinic Receptor-Targeted Hydrophobic Eigenmode Matched Peptides as Functional Modulators
Biophys. J., March 1, 2004; 86(3): 1308 - 1331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Bahr, J. D. Thompson, J.-C. Thierry, and O. Poch
BAliBASE (Benchmark Alignment dataBASE): enhancements for repeats, transmembrane sequences and circular permutations
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2001; 29(1): 323 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.