Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on May 14, 2004
Bioinformatics 2004 20(16):2719-2725; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth317
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/16/2719    most recent
bth317v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Omont, N.
Right arrow Articles by Képès, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Omont, N.
Right arrow Articles by Képès, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics vol. 20 issue 16 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.

Transcription/replication collisions cause bacterial transcription units to be longer on the leading strand of replication

Nicolas Omont and François Képès *

ATGC, CNRS UMR 8071/genopole®, 523 Terrasses de l'Agora, 91000 Evry, France

Received on January 11, 2004; revised on April 19, 2004; accepted on April 26, 2004
Advance Access Publication May 14, 2004

Motivation: The costs of head-on versus codirectional collisions between the replication complex and the much slower transcription complex on the circular bacterial chromosomes are much debated. Although it is established that the number of genes on the leading strand is higher than on the lagging strand of replication, the consequences of collisions on the length of transcription units are unknown.

Results: Here, we show that transcription units are generally longer on the leading strand, in rough proportion to the bias in number of units between the two strands. We propose a statistical physics model, based on the assumption that the proportion of interrupted transcripts for each unit is the major factor contributing to these biases. Its main prediction is that a large replication/transcription speed ratio implies a low leading/lagging bias for transcription unit length and number. This model is validated by an analysis of proven and predicted units in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. The results are consistent with an equal cost of head-on versus codirectional collisions.

Contact: francois.kepes{at}genopole.cnrs.fr

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
S. A. F. T. van Hijum, M. H. Medema, and O. P. Kuipers
Mechanisms and Evolution of Control Logic in Prokaryotic Transcriptional Regulation
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., September 1, 2009; 73(3): 481 - 509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. D. Wang, M. B. Berkmen, and A. D. Grossman
Genome-wide coorientation of replication and transcription reduces adverse effects on replication in Bacillus subtilis
PNAS, March 27, 2007; 104(13): 5608 - 5613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. N. Price, E. J. Alm, and A. P. Arkin
Interruptions in gene expression drive highly expressed operons to the leading strand of DNA replication
Nucleic Acids Res., June 7, 2005; 33(10): 3224 - 3234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.