Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on July 29, 2004
Bioinformatics 2004 20(18):3544-3552; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth441
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/18/3544    most recent
bth441v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linder, R.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Linder, R.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics vol. 20 issue 18 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.

The ‘subsequent artificial neural network’ (SANN) approach might bring more classificatory power to ANN-based DNA microarray analyses

Roland Linder 1,*, Dawn Dew 2, Holger Sudhoff 3, Dirk Theegarten 2, Klaus Remberger 4, Siegfried J. Pöppl 1 and Mathias Wagner 4

1 Institute for Medical Informatics, Medical University of Luebeck, 23538 Luebeck, Germany, 2 Institute of Pathology, Ruhr-University of Bochum Medical School, 44787 Bochum, Germany, 3 Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Ruhr-University of Bochum Medical School, 44787 Bochum, Germany, 4 Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of the Saarland, 66421 Homburg-Saar, Germany

Received on May 19, 2004; revised on July 20, 2004; accepted on July 23, 2004
Advance Access Publication July 29, 2004

Motivation: Human decisions often proceed in two steps. Initially those most preferred are chosen followed by a subsequent choice of these preferences. Applying one artificial neural network (ANN), a classification is limited to the preselection process. The final categorization is only possible by a subsequent ANN that distinguishes the pre-chosen classes. Existing strategies using coupled ANNs are discussed and a new approach particularly suited for multiclass classification problems is introduced (‘Subsequent ANN’, SANN).

Results: Evaluating a simulated data base comprising 3 classes, classification results of SANN were obviously superior to those achieved by ANN. To evaluate a real-world data base the microarray benchmark GCM (14 classes) was chosen. The ANN results reached 72%, comparable to previous results. Using SANN, up to 81% of the tumors were correctly classified.

Availability: Programs used in this work and numerical results are available upon request.

Contact: linder{at}imi.uni-luebeck.de

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
Z. Wang, Y. Wang, J. Xuan, Y. Dong, M. Bakay, Y. Feng, R. Clarke, and E. P. Hoffman
Optimized multilayer perceptrons for molecular classification and diagnosis using genomic data
Bioinformatics, March 15, 2006; 22(6): 755 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.