Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, A. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Vol. 20 no. 2 2004, pages 180-185
Bioinformatics © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.


PAG Meeting Applications Note

A comparative phylogenetic approach for dating whole genome duplication events

Brad A. Chapman 1,2,*, John E. Bowers 2, Stefan R. Schulze 2 and Andrew H. Paterson 2

1 Department of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA and 2 Plant Genome Mapping Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA

Received on November 9, 2003 ; accepted on November 20, 2003

Motivation: Whole genome duplications have played a major role in determining the structure of eukaryotic genomes. Current evidence revealing large blocks of duplicated chromatin yields new insights into the evolutionary history of species, but also presents a major challenge for researchers attempting to utilize comparative genomics techniques. Understanding the timing of duplication events relative to divergence among taxa is critical to accurate and comprehensive cross-species comparisons.

Results: We describe a large-scale approach to estimate the timing of duplication events in a phylogenetic context. The methodology has been previously utilized for analysis of Arabidopsis and Saccharomyces duplication events. This new implementation provides a more flexible and reusable framework for these analyses. Scripts written in the Python programming language drive a number of freely available bioinformatics programs, creating a no-cost tool for researchers. The usefulness of the approach is demonstrated through genome-scale analysis of Arabidopsis and Oryza (rice) duplications.

Availability: Software and documentation are freely available from http://plantgenome.agtec.uga.edu/bioinformatics/dating/

Contact: chapmanb{at}uga.edu

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
M. Freeling and B. C. Thomas
Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity
Genome Res., July 1, 2006; 16(7): 805 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
B. C. Thomas, B. Pedersen, and M. Freeling
Following tetraploidy in an Arabidopsis ancestor, genes were removed preferentially from one homeolog leaving clusters enriched in dose-sensitive genes
Genome Res., July 1, 2006; 16(7): 934 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
M. E. Schranz and T. Mitchell-Olds
Independent Ancient Polyploidy Events in the Sister Families Brassicaceae and Cleomaceae
PLANT CELL, May 1, 2006; 18(5): 1152 - 1165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. H. Paterson, J. E. Bowers, and B. A. Chapman
Ancient polyploidization predating divergence of the cereals, and its consequences for comparative genomics
PNAS, June 29, 2004; 101(26): 9903 - 9908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.