Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on January 22, 2004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bioinformatics 20(5) © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.
Degrees of differential gene expression: detecting biologically significant expression differences and estimating their magnitudes
Medical College of Georgia, Office of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Augusta, GA 30912-4900, USA
Received on March 5, 2003
; revised on September 29, 2003
; accepted on October 1, 2003
Advance Access Publication January 22, 2004
Motivation: Many methods of identifying differential expression in genes depend on testing the null hypotheses of exactly equal means or distributions of expression levels for each gene across groups, even though a statistically significant difference in the expression level does not imply the occurrence of any difference of biological or clinical significance. This is because a mathematical definition of ‘differential expression’ as any non-zero difference does not correspond to the differential expression biologists seek. Furthermore, while some current methods account for multiple comparisons in hypothesis tests, they do not accordingly adjust estimates of the degrees to which genes are differentially expressed. Both problems lead to overstating the relevance of findings.
Results: Testing whether genes have relevant differential expression can be accomplished with customized null hypotheses, thereby redefining ‘differential expression’ in a way that is more biologically meaningful. When such tests control the false discovery rate, they effectively discover genes based on a desired quantile of differential gene expression. Estimation of the degree to which genes are differentially expressed has been corrected for multiple comparisons.
Availability: R code is freely available from http://www.davidbickel.com and may become available from www.r-project.org or www.bioconductor.org
Supplementary information: Applications to cancer microarrays, an application in the absence of differential expression, pseudocode, and a guide to customizing the methods may be found at www.davidbickel.com and www.mathpreprints.com
Contact: bickel{at}prueba.info
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. R. Bickel, Z. Montazeri, P.-C. Hsieh, M. Beatty, S. J. Lawit, and N. J. Bate Gene network reconstruction from transcriptional dynamics under kinetic model uncertainty: a case for the second derivative Bioinformatics, March 15, 2009; 25(6): 772 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Zhou, C. Cras-Meneur, M. Ohsugi, G. D. Stormo, and M. Alan. Permutt A global approach to identify differentially expressed genes in cDNA (two-color) microarray experiments Bioinformatics, August 15, 2007; 23(16): 2073 - 2079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Wang, Y. Lv, Z. Guo, X. Li, Y. Li, J. Zhu, D. Yang, J. Xu, C. Wang, S. Rao, et al. Effects of replacing the unreliable cDNA microarray measurements on the disease classification based on gene expression profiles and functional modules Bioinformatics, December 1, 2006; 22(23): 2883 - 2889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. S. Haqqani, M. Nesic, E. Preston, E. Baumann, J. Kelly, and D. Stanimirovic Characterization of vascular protein expression patterns in cerebral ischemia/reperfusion using laser capture microdissection and ICAT-nanoLC-MS/MS FASEB J, November 1, 2005; 19(13): 1809 - 1821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. R. Bickel Probabilities of spurious connections in gene networks: application to expression time series Bioinformatics, April 1, 2005; 21(7): 1121 - 1128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Reverter, S. M. McWilliam, W. Barris, and B. P. Dalrymple A rapid method for computationally inferring transcriptome coverage and microarray sensitivity Bioinformatics, January 1, 2005; 21(1): 80 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|