Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Screen PDF)
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trinh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sankoff, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trinh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sankoff, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Bioinformatics 20(Suppl. 1) © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.

Genomic features in the breakpoint regions between syntenic blocks

Phil Trinh 1, Aoife McLysaght 2 and David Sankoff 3,*

1 Hillcrest High School, Ottawa K1G 2L7, Canada, 2 Genetics Department, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland and 3 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Ottawa, 585 King Edward Avenue, Ottawa K1N 6N5, Canada

Received on January 15, 2004; accepted on March 1, 2004

Motivation: We study the largely unaligned regions between the syntenic blocks conserved in humans and mice, based on data extracted from the UCSC genome browser. These regions contain evolutionary breakpoints caused by inversion, translocation and other processes.

Results: We suggest explanations for the limited amount of genomic alignment in the neighbourhoods of breakpoints. We discount inferences of extensive breakpoint reuse as artefacts introduced during the reconstruction of syntenic blocks. We find that the number, size and distribution of small aligned fragments in the breakpoint regions depend on the origin of the neighbouring blocks and the other blocks on the same chromosome. We account for this and for the generalized loss of alignment in the regions partially by artefacts due to alignment protocols and partially by mutational processes operative only after the rearrangement event. These results are consistent with breakpoints occurring randomly over virtually the entire genome.

Contact: sankoff{at}uottawa.ca

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
C. Webber and C. P. Ponting
Hotspots of mutation and breakage in dog and human chromosomes
Genome Res., December 1, 2005; 15(12): 1787 - 1797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.