Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on February 24, 2005
Bioinformatics 2005 21(10):2294-2300; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti177
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Using evolutionary Expectation Maximization to estimate indel rates
Department of Statistics 1 South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3TG, UK
*Present address: Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-1762, USA
Motivation: The Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm, in the form of the Baum–Welch algorithm (for hidden Markov models) or the Inside-Outside algorithm (for stochastic context-free grammars), is a powerful way to estimate the parameters of stochastic grammars for biological sequence analysis. To use this algorithm for multiple-sequence evolutionary modelling, it would be useful to apply the EM algorithm to estimate not only the probability parameters of the stochastic grammar, but also the instantaneous mutation rates of the underlying evolutionary model (to facilitate the development of stochastic grammars based on phylogenetic trees, also known as Statistical Alignment). Recently, we showed how to do this for the point substitution component of the evolutionary process; here, we extend these results to the indel process.
Results: We present an algorithm for maximum-likelihood estimation of insertion and deletion rates from multiple sequence alignments, using EM, under the single-residue indel model owing to Thorne, Kishino and Felsenstein (the ‘TKF91’ model). The algorithm converges extremely rapidly, gives accurate results on simulated data that are an improvement over parsimonious estimates (which are shown to underestimate the true indel rate), and gives plausible results on experimental data (coronavirus envelope domains). Owing to the algorithm's close similarity to the Baum–Welch algorithm for training hidden Markov models, it can be used in an ‘unsupervised’ fashion to estimate rates for unaligned sequences, or estimate several sets of rates for sequences with heterogenous rates.
Availability: Software implementing the algorithm and the benchmark is available under GPL from http://www.biowiki.org/
Contact: ihh{at}berkeley.edu
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Satija, L. Pachter, and J. Hein Combining statistical alignment and phylogenetic footprinting to detect regulatory elements Bioinformatics, May 15, 2008; 24(10): 1236 - 1242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. K. Bradley and I. Holmes Transducers: an emerging probabilistic framework for modeling indels on trees Bioinformatics, December 1, 2007; 23(23): 3258 - 3262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Holmes Phylocomposer and phylodirector: analysis and visualization of transducer indel models Bioinformatics, December 1, 2007; 23(23): 3263 - 3264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Carmel, Y. I. Wolf, I. B. Rogozin, and E. V. Koonin Three distinct modes of intron dynamics in the evolution of eukaryotes Genome Res., July 1, 2007; 17(7): 1034 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Brandstrom and H. Ellegren The Genomic Landscape of Short Insertion and Deletion Polymorphisms in the Chicken (Gallus gallus) Genome: A High Frequency of Deletions in Tandem Duplicates Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1691 - 1701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|