Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on December 7, 2004
Bioinformatics 2005 21(8):1325-1331; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti160
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/8/1325    most recent
bti160v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krebs, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krebs, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, C. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2004. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions{at}oupjournals.org

Autoregressive modeling of analytical sensor data can yield classifiers in the predictor coefficient parameter space

Melissa D. Krebs 1,{dagger}, Robert D. Tingley 2,{dagger}, Julie E. Zeskind 1, Joung-Mo Kang 3, Maria E. Holmboe 1 and Cristina E. Davis 1,*

1Mechanical and Instruments Division, Bioengineering Group Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
2Electronics Division, RF and Communication Systems Group Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
3Electronics Division, Analog Systems Group, The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Summary: The analysis of chromatographic data resulting from complex chemical mixtures is challenging. Components may co-elute, causing their signals to overlap. An algorithm that will increase the signal-to-noise ratio so compounds present in low abundance can be better distinguished from noise is useful in this type of analysis. The autoregressive (AR) filter offers the advantage of smoothing chromatograms to increase this ratio, while also offering data compression and increased resolution. Furthermore, this filter can be useful for classification, as the roots of the predictor coefficient vectors represent features present in the data and can therefore be used for pattern recognition. In this paper, we present a novel method for applying AR filtering to chromatogram data. We show that the AR filter outperforms the Savitzky–Golay filter for smoothing noise while retaining important information within chromatograms, and also that AR correlation coefficients have the potential to be used to classify chromatogram data into groups.

Contact: cdavis{at}draper.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.