Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on December 7, 2004
Bioinformatics 2005 21(8):1464-1471; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti204
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/8/1464    most recent
bti204v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gough, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gough, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2004. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions{at}oupjournals.org

Convergent evolution of domain architectures (is rare)

Julian Gough

RIKEN Genomic Sciences Centre 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan

Motivation: In this paper, we shall examine the evolution of domain architectures across 62 genomes of known phylogeny including all kingdoms of life. We look in particular at the possibility of convergent evolution, with a view to determining the extent to which the architectures observed in the genomes are due to functional necessity or evolutionary descent. We used domains of known structure, because from this and other information we know their evolutionary relationships. We use a range of methods including phylogenetic grouping, sequence similarity/alignment, mutation rates and comparative genomics to approach this difficult problem from several angles.

Results: Although we do not claim an exhaustive analysis, we conclude that between 0.4 and 4% of sequences are involved in convergent evolution of domain architectures, and expect the actual number to be close to the lower bound. We also made two incidental observations, albeit on a small sample: the events leading to convergent evolution appear to be random with no functional or structural preferences, and changes in the number of tandem repeat domains occur more readily than changes which alter the domain composition.

Conclusion: The principal conclusion is that the observed domain architectures of the sequences in the genomes are driven by evolutionary descent rather than functional necessity.

Contact: gough{at}supfam.org


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BioinformaticsHome page
K. Forslund and E. L. Sonnhammer
Benchmarking homology detection procedures with low complexity filters
Bioinformatics, October 1, 2009; 25(19): 2500 - 2505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
T. Kawashima, S. Kawashima, C. Tanaka, M. Murai, M. Yoneda, N. H. Putnam, D. S. Rokhsar, M. Kanehisa, N. Satoh, and H. Wada
Domain shuffling and the evolution of vertebrates
Genome Res., August 1, 2009; 19(8): 1393 - 1403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Brief BioinformHome page
M. K. Basu, E. Poliakov, and I. B. Rogozin
Domain mobility in proteins: functional and evolutionary implications
Brief Bioinform, May 1, 2009; 10(3): 205 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Xie and P. E. Bourne
Detecting evolutionary relationships across existing fold space, using sequence order-independent profile-profile alignments
PNAS, April 8, 2008; 105(14): 5441 - 5446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
K. Forslund, A. Henricson, V. Hollich, and E. L. L. Sonnhammer
Domain Tree-Based Analysis of Protein Architecture Evolution
Mol. Biol. Evol., February 1, 2008; 25(2): 254 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome ResHome page
M. Wang, L. S. Yafremava, D. Caetano-Anolles, J. E. Mittenthal, and G. Caetano-Anolles
Reductive evolution of architectural repertoires in proteomes and the birth of the tripartite world
Genome Res., November 1, 2007; 17(11): 1572 - 1585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Caetano-Anolles, H. S. Kim, and J. E. Mittenthal
The origin of modern metabolic networks inferred from phylogenomic analysis of protein architecture
PNAS, May 29, 2007; 104(22): 9358 - 9363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
M. Wang and G. Caetano-Anolles
Global Phylogeny Determined by the Combination of Protein Domains in Proteomes
Mol. Biol. Evol., December 1, 2006; 23(12): 2444 - 2454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. Gough
Genomic scale sub-family assignment of protein domains
Nucleic Acids Res., July 28, 2006; 34(13): 3625 - 3633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.