Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on January 12, 2005
Bioinformatics 2005 21(9):2017-2026; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti255
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/9/2017    most recent
bti255v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Coghill, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by King, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Coghill, G. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions{at}oupjournals.org

On the use of qualitative reasoning to simulate and identify metabolic pathways

Ross D. King 1,*, Simon M. Garrett 1 and George M. Coghill 2

1Department of Computer Science, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Wales, SY23 3DB, UK
2Department of Computing Science, University of Aberdeen Aberdeen, ABD24 3UE, UK

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Motivation: Perhaps the greatest challenge of modern biology is to develop accurate in silico models of cells. To do this we require computational formalisms for both simulation (how according to the model the state of the cell evolves over time) and identification (learning a model cell from observation of states). We propose the use of qualitative reasoning (QR) as a unified formalism for both tasks. The two most commonly used alternative methods of modelling biochemical pathways are ordinary differential equations (ODEs), and logical/graph-based (LG) models.

Results: The QR formalism we use is an abstraction of ODEs. It enables the behaviour of many ODEs, with different functional forms and parameters, to be captured in a single QR model. QR has the advantage over LG models of explicitly including dynamics. To simulate biochemical pathways we have developed ‘enzyme’ and ‘metabolite’ QR building blocks that fit together to form models. These models are finite, directly executable, easy to interpret and robust. To identify QR models we have developed heuristic chemoinformatics graph analysis and machine learning procedures. The graph analysis procedure is a series of constraints and heuristics that limit the number of ways metabolites can combine to form pathways. The machine learning procedure is generate-and-test inductive logic programming. We illustrate the use of QR for modelling and simulation using the example of glycolysis.

Availability: All data and programs used are available on request.

Contact: rdk{at}aber.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
G. Tsafnat and E. W. Coiera
Computational Reasoning across Multiple Models
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2009; 16(6): 768 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
J. E. Beasley and F. J. Planes
Recovering metabolic pathways via optimization
Bioinformatics, January 1, 2007; 23(1): 92 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.