Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on July 28, 2006
Bioinformatics 2006 22(19):2381-2387; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl399
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/19/2381    most recent
btl399v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oberg, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Therneau, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oberg, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Therneau, T. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Joint estimation of calibration and expression for high-density oligonucleotide arrays

Ann L. Oberg *, Douglas W. Mahoney , Karla V. Ballman and Terry M. Therneau

Division of Biostatistics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Motivation: The need for normalization in microarray experiments has been well documented in the literature. Currently, many analysis methods treat normalization and analysis as a series of steps, with summarized data carried forward to the next step.

Results: We present a unified algorithm which incorporates normalization and class comparison in one analysis using probe level perfect match and mismatch data. The algorithm is based on calibration models common to most biological assays, and the resulting chip-specific parameters have a natural interpretation. We show that the algorithm fits into the statistical generalized linear models framework, describe a practical fitting strategy and present results of the algorithm applied to an example dataset as well as based on metrics used in affycomp. The algorithm ranks amongst the top third of the affycomp competitors, performing best in measures of bias.

Availability: R functions are available on request from the authors.

Contact: oberg.ann{at}mayo.edu


Received on December 23, 2006; revised on June 9, 2006; accepted on July 18, 2006

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.