Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on December 6, 2005
Bioinformatics 2006 22(4):430-437; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti819
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
22/4/430    most recent
bti819v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wingender, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wingender, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Evaluating phylogenetic footprinting for human–rodent comparisons

Tilman Sauer 1,*, Ekaterina Shelest 1 and Edgar Wingender 1,2

1Department of Bioinformatics, UKG, Georg-August-University of Goettingen Goldschmidtstrasse 1, 37077 Goettingen, Germany
2BIOBASE GmbH, Halchtersche Strasse 33, 38304 Wolfenbuettel, Germany

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Motivation: ‘Phylogenetic footprinting’ is a widely applied approach to identify regulatory regions and potential transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) using alignments of non-coding orthologous regions from two or more organisms. A systematic evaluation of its validity and usability based on known TFBSs is needed to use phylogenetic footprinting most effectively in the identification of unknown TFBSs.

Results: In this paper we use 2678 human, mouse and rat TFBSs from the TRANSFAC® database for this evaluation. To ensure the retrieval of correct orthologous sequences, we combine gene annotation and sequence homology searches. Demanding a sequence identity of at least 65% is most effective in discriminating TFBSs from non-functional sequence parts, while different alignment algorithms only have a minor influence on TFBS identification by human–rodent comparisons. With this threshold ~72% of the known TFBSs are found conserved, a number which varies significantly between different transcription factors and also depends on the function of the regulated gene. TFBSs for certain transcription factors do not require strict sequence conservation but instead may show a high pattern conservation, limiting somewhat the validity of purely sequence-based phylogenetic footprinting.

Availability: Scripts are available from the authors upon request.

Contact: tsa{at}bioinf.med.uni-goettingen.de

Supplementary information: http://www.sybig.de/download

Received on September 27, 2005; revised on November 30, 2005; accepted on December 2, 2005

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Brief BioinformHome page
E. Wingender
The TRANSFAC project as an example of framework technology that supports the analysis of genomic regulation
Brief Bioinform, July 1, 2008; 9(4): 326 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. W. Tullai, J. Chen, M. E. Schaffer, E. Kamenetsky, S. Kasif, and G. M. Cooper
Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Represses Cyclic AMP Response Element-binding Protein (CREB)-targeted Immediate Early Genes in Quiescent Cells
J. Biol. Chem., March 30, 2007; 282(13): 9482 - 9491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.