Skip Navigation

Bioinformatics 2007 23(2):e148-e155; doi:10.1093/Bioinformatics/btl324
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hertz, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yanover, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hertz, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yanover, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Machine Learning in Computational Biology

Identifying HLA supertypes by learning distance functions

Tomer Hertz 1,2,*,{dagger} and Chen Yanover 1,*,{dagger}

1 School of Computer Science and Engineering Israel
2 Interdisciplinary Center for Neural Computation, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Israel

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

Motivation: The development of epitope-based vaccines crucially relies on the ability to classify Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) molecules into sets that have similar peptide binding specificities, termed supertypes. In their seminal work, Sette and Sidney defined nine HLA class I supertypes and claimed that these provide an almost perfect coverage of the entire repertoire of HLA class I molecules.

HLA alleles are highly polymorphic and polygenic and therefore experimentally classifying each of these molecules to supertypes is at present an impossible task. Recently, a number of computational methods have been proposed for this task. These methods are based on defining protein similarity measures, derived from analysis of binding peptides or from analysis of the proteins themselves.

Results: In this paper we define both peptide derived and protein derived similarity measures, which are based on learning distance functions. The peptide derived measure is defined using a peptide–peptide distance function, which is learned using information about known binding and non-binding peptides. The protein derived similarity measure is defined using a protein–protein distance function, which is learned using information about alleles previously classified to supertypes by Sette and Sidney (1999). We compare the classification obtained by these two complimentary methods to previously suggested classification methods. In general, our results are in excellent agreement with the classifications suggested by Sette and Sidney (1999) and with those reported by Buus et al. (2004).

The main important advantage of our proposed distance-based approach is that it makes use of two different and important immunological sources of information—HLA alleles and peptides that are known to bind or not bind to these alleles. Since each of our distance measures is trained using a different source of information, their combination can provide a more confident classification of alleles to supertypes.

Contact: tomboy{at}cs.huji.ac.il; cheny{at}cs.huji.ac.il

{dagger}The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. A. Chentoufi, X. Zhang, K. Lamberth, G. Dasgupta, I. Bettahi, A. Nguyen, M. Wu, X. Zhu, A. Mohebbi, S. Buus, et al.
HLA-A*0201-Restricted CD8+ Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Epitopes Identified from Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoprotein D
J. Immunol., January 1, 2008; 180(1): 426 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
C. Lundegaard, O. Lund, C. Kesmir, S. Brunak, and M. Nielsen
Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations
Bioinformatics, December 15, 2007; 23(24): 3265 - 3275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.