Skip Navigation

Bioinformatics 2007 23(2):e225-e230; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl318
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacob, E.
Right arrow Articles by Unger, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacob, E.
Right arrow Articles by Unger, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Structural Bioinformatics

A tale of two tails: why are terminal residues of proteins exposed?

Etai Jacob and Ron Unger *

The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University Ramat-Gan, 52900, Israel

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

Motivation: It is widely known that terminal residues of proteins (i.e. the N- and C-termini) are predominantly located on the surface of proteins and exposed to the solvent. However, there is no good explanation as to the forces driving this phenomenon. The common explanation that terminal residues are charged, and charged residues prefer to be on the surface, cannot explain the magnitude of the phenomenon. Here, we survey a large number of proteins from the PDB in order to explore, quantitatively, this phenomenon, and then we use a lattice model to study the mechanisms involved.

Results: The location of the termini was examined for 425 small monomeric proteins (50–200 amino acids) and it was found that the average solvent accessibility of termini residues is 87.1% compared with 49.2% of charged residues and 35.9% of all residues. Using a cutoff of 50% of the maximal possible exposure, 80.3% of the N-terminal and 86.1% of the C-terminal residues are exposed compared to 32% for all residues. In addition, terminal residues are much more distant from the center of mass of their proteins than other residues. Using a 2D lattice, a large population of model proteins was studied on three levels: structural selection of compact structures, thermodynamic selection of conformations with a pronounced energy gap and kinetic selection of fast folding proteins using Monte-Carlo simulations. Progressively, each selection raises the proportion of proteins with termini on the surface, resulting in similar proportions to those observed for real proteins.

Contact: ron{at}biocom1.ls.biu.ac.il



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
E. Jacob, A. Horovitz, and R. Unger
Different mechanistic requirements for prokaryotic and eukaryotic chaperonins: a lattice study
Bioinformatics, July 1, 2007; 23(13): i240 - i248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.