Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on January 18, 2007
Bioinformatics 2007 23(5):573-581; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl661
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Structure-based evaluation of in silico predictions of protein–protein interactions using Comparative Docking
1Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom and 2Grup de Bioinformàtica Estructural (GRIB-IMIM), Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona 08003, Catalonia, Spain
*To whom correspondence should be addressed.
| Abstract |
|---|
Motivation: Due to the limitations in experimental methods for determining binary interactions and structure determination of protein complexes, the need exists for computational models to fill the increasing gap between genome sequence information and protein annotation. Here we describe a novel method that uses structural models to reduce a large number of in silico predictions to a high confidence subset that is amenable to experimental validation.
Results: A two-stage evaluation procedure was developed, first, a sequence-based method assessed the conservation of protein interface patches used in the original in silico prediction method, both in terms of position within the primary sequence, and in terms of sequence conservation. When applying the most stringent conditions it was found that 20.5% of the data set being assessed passed this test. Secondly, a high-throughput structure-based docking evaluation procedure assessed the soundness of three dimensional models produced for the putative interactions. Of the data set being assessed, 8264 interactions or over 70% could be modelled in this way, and 27% of these can be considered valid by the applied criteria. In all, 6.9% of the interactions passed both the tests and can be considered to be a high confidence set of predicted interactions, several of which are described.
Availability: http://bioinformatics.leeds.ac.uk/~bmb4sjc
Contact: r.m.jackson{at}leeds.ac.uk
Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Received on July 14, 2006; revised on November 13, 2006; accepted on December 19, 2006
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Hofmann-Apitius, J. Fluck, L. Furlong, O. Fornes, C. Kolarik, S. Hanser, M. Boeker, S. Schulz, F. Sanz, R. Klinger, et al. Knowledge environments representing molecular entities for the virtual physiological human Phil Trans R Soc A, September 13, 2008; 366(1878): 3091 - 3110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Fukuhara and T. Kawabata HOMCOS: a server to predict interacting protein pairs and interacting sites by homology modeling of complex structures Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2008; 36(suppl_2): W185 - W189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Aguilar, L. Skrabanek, S. S. Gross, B. Oliva, and F. Campagne Beyond tissueInfo: functional prediction using tissue expression profile similarity searches Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2008; 36(11): 3728 - 3737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

