Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on January 31, 2007
Bioinformatics 2007 23(7):875-881; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm028
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
23/7/875    most recent
btm028v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patnaik, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patnaik, P. R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Robustness analysis of the E.coli chemosensory system to perturbations in chemoattractant concentrations

Pratap R. Patnaik

Institute of Microbial Technology, Sector 39-A, Chandigarh-160 036, India


  Abstract

Motivation: Cells of Escherichia coli sense and move toward chemical attractants. This is done through an intricate sensory system that eventually directs the movements of flagellae which regulate the ‘runs’ and ‘tumbles’ of the cells. Under realistic conditions, chemical stimuli often fluctuate due to noise from the environment. The effect of noise on the chemosensory system has been investigated here through the sensitivity coefficients of the concentrations of four key proteins—the phosphorylated forms of CheA, CheB and CheY, and the FliM-CheY~P complex—that govern chemotactic motility. The letter P denotes phosphorylation.

Results: All sensitivities increased with time and then stabilized. However, the four sets of sensitivities differed in their magnitudes and the durations of their transient phases before stabilization. CheA~P was the least sensitive and CheY~P the most sensitive. Moreover, while the sensitivities of CheA~P, CheB~P and CheY~P increased with chemoattractant concentration, that of the FliM complex decreased. These differences have been interpreted in terms of the mechanism of the chemosensory system and they have important implications for practical applications of chemotaxis.

Contact: pratap{at}imtech.res.in

Associate Editor: Alfonso Valencia

Received on September 13, 2006; revised on January 2, 2007; accepted on January 23, 2007

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.