Skip Navigation

Bioinformatics 2008 24(16):i7-i13; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn276
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dalevi, D.
Right arrow Articles by Markowitz, V. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dalevi, D.
Right arrow Articles by Markowitz, V. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Annotation of metagenome short reads using proxygenes

Daniel Dalevi 1, Natalia N. Ivanova 2, Konstantinos Mavromatis 2, Sean D. Hooper 2, Ernest Szeto 1, Philip Hugenholtz 3, Nikos C. Kyrpides 2 and Victor M. Markowitz 1,*

1Biological Data Management and Technology Center, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, 2Genome Biology Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Dr, Walnut Creek and 3Microbial Ecology Program, DOE Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Dr, Walnut Creek, CA 94598, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

Motivation: A typical metagenome dataset generated using a 454 pyrosequencing platform consists of short reads sampled from the collective genome of a microbial community. The amount of sequence in such datasets is usually insufficient for assembly, and traditional gene prediction cannot be applied to unassembled short reads. As a result, analysis of such datasets usually involves comparisons in terms of relative abundances of various protein families. The latter requires assignment of individual reads to protein families, which is hindered by the fact that short reads contain only a fragment, usually small, of a protein.

Results: We have considered the assignment of pyrosequencing reads to protein families directly using RPS-BLAST against COG and Pfam databases and indirectly via proxygenes that are identified using BLASTx searches against protein sequence databases. Using simulated metagenome datasets as benchmarks, we show that the proxygene method is more accurate than the direct assignment. We introduce a clustering method which significantly reduces the size of a metagenome dataset while maintaining a faithful representation of its functional and taxonomic content.

Contact: vmmarkowitz{at}lbl.gov



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
M. Hamady and R. Knight
Microbial community profiling for human microbiome projects: Tools, techniques, and challenges
Genome Res., July 1, 2009; 19(7): 1141 - 1152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.