Skip Navigation


Bioinformatics Advance Access originally published online on January 19, 2008
Bioinformatics 2008 24(5):652-658; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn022
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (Print PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/5/652    most recent
btn022v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernauer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Poupon, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bernauer, J.
Right arrow Articles by Poupon, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

DiMoVo: a Voronoi tessellation-based method for discriminating crystallographic and biological protein–protein interactions

Julie Bernauer 1,2, Ranjit Prasad Bahadur 2, Francis Rodier 3, Joël Janin 2 and Anne Poupon 2,*

1Department of Structural Biology, Fairchild Science Building, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5126, USA, 2Yeast Structural Genomics, IBBMC UMR 8619, bâtiment 430, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay and 3LEBS UPR 9063, CNRS, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France

*To whom correspondence should be addressed.


  Abstract

Motivation: Knowledge of the oligomeric state of a protein is often essential for understanding its function and mechanism. Within a protein crystal, each protein monomer is in contact with many others, forming many small interfaces and a few larger ones that are biologically significant if the protein is a homodimer in solution, but not if the protein is monomeric. Telling such ‘crystal dimers’ from real ones remains a difficult task.

Results: It has already been demonstrated that the interfaces of native and non-native protein–protein complexes can be distinguished using a combination of parameters computed with a method on the Voronoi tessellation. We show in this article that the same parameters highlight significant differences between the interfaces of biological and crystal dimers. Using these parameters as descriptors in machine learning methods leads to accurate classification of specific and non-specific protein–protein interfaces.

Availability: Software is available at http://fifi.ibbmc.u-psud.fr/DiMoVo

Contact: anne{at}rezo.net

Associate Editor: Burkhard Rost

Received on October 30, 2007; revised on January 10, 2008; accepted on January 10, 2008

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Brief BioinformHome page
N. Tuncbag, G. Kar, O. Keskin, A. Gursoy, and R. Nussinov
A survey of available tools and web servers for analysis of protein-protein interactions and interfaces
Brief Bioinform, May 1, 2009; 10(3): 217 - 232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.