Skip Navigation



Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on February 5, 2004

Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth034
Bioinformatics © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/7/1022    most recent
bth034v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cutler, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cutler, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received February 6, 2003
Revised October 13, 2003
Accepted October 21, 2003

Article

Discrepancies in dbSNP confirmation rates and allele frequency distributions from varying genotyping error rates and patterns

Adele A. Mitchell 1, Michael E. Zwick 1, Aravinda Chakravarti 1, David J. Cutler 1*

1 McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21287

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dcutler{at}jhmi.edu.


   Abstract

Three recent publications have examined the quality and completeness of dbSNP and have come to dramatically different conclusions regarding dbSNP's false positive rate and the proportion of dbSNPs that are expected to be common. These studies employed different genotyping technologies and different protocols in determining minimum acceptable genotyping quality thresholds. Because heterozygous sites typically have lower quality scores than homozygous sites, a higher minimum quality threshold reduces the number of false positive SNPs, but yields fewer heterozygotes and leads to fewer confirmed SNPs. To account for the different confirmation rates and distributions of minor allele frequencies, we propose that the three confirmation studies have different false-positive and false-negative rates. We developed a mathematical model to predict SNP confirmation rates and the apparent distribution of minor allele frequencies under user-specified false positive and false-negative rates. We applied this model to the three published studies and to our own resequencing effort. We conclude that the dbSNP false positive rate is approximately 15-17% and that the reported confirmation studies have vastly different genotyping error rates and patterns.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
K. C. Barnes
Genetic Determinants and Ethnic Disparities in Sepsis-associated Acute Lung Injury
Proceedings of the ATS, October 1, 2005; 2(3): 195 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
A. A. Mitchell, A. Chakravarti, and D. J. Cutler
On the probability that a novel variant is a disease-causing mutation
Genome Res., July 1, 2005; 15(7): 960 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
C. S. Carlson, M. J. Reider, D. A. Nickerson, M. A. Eberle, and L. Kruglyak
COMMENT ON 'DISCREPANCIES IN dbSNP CONFIRMATIONS RATES AND ALLELE FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS FROM VARYING GENOTYPING ERROR RATES AND PATTERNS'
Bioinformatics, January 15, 2005; 21(2): 141 - 143.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.