Skip Navigation



Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on May 6, 2004

Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth234
Bioinformatics © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/14/2242    most recent
bth234v2
bth234v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carter, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bond, A. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carter, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Bond, A. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Received June 25, 2003
Revised March 18, 2004
Accepted March 19, 2004

Article

Gene expression network topology provides a framework for molecular characterization of cellular state

Scott L. Carter 1*, Christian M. Brechbühler 1, Michael Griffin 1, Andrew T. Bond 1*

1 Xpogen, Inc., 1340 Centre Street, Newton Centre, Massachusetts 02459, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: abond{at}xpogen.com.


   Abstract

Motivation: Gene expression data has become an instrumental resource in describing the molecular state associated with various cellular phenotypes and responses to environmental perturbations. The utility of expression profiling has been demonstrated in partitioning clinical states, predicting the class of unknown samples, and in assigning putative functional roles to previously uncharacterized genes based on profile similarity. However, gene expression profiling has had only limited success in identifying therapeutic targets. This is partly due to the fact that current methods based on fold-change focus only on single genes in isolation, and thus cannot convey causal information. In this paper we present a technique for analysis of expression data in a graph-theoretic framework that relies on associations between genes. We describe the global organization of these networks and biological correlates of their structure. We go on to present a novel technique for the molecular characterization of disparate cellular states that adds a new dimension to fold-based methods and conclude with an example application to a human medulloblastoma dataset.

Results: We have shown that expression networks generated from large model-organism expression datasets are scale-free and that the average clustering coefficient of these networks is several orders of magnitude higher than would be expected for similarly sized scale-free networks, suggesting an inherent hierarchical modularity similar to that previously identified in other biological networks. Furthermore, we have shown that these properties are robust with respect to the parameters of network construction. We have demonstrated an enrichment of genes having lethal knockout phenotypes in the high-degree (i.e. Hub) nodes in networks generated from aggregate condition datasets; using process-focused S. cerivisiae datasets we have demonstrated additional high-degree enrichments of condition-specific genes encoding proteins known to be involved in or important for the processes interrogated by the microarrays. These results demonstrate the utility of network analysis applied to expression data in identifying genes that are regulated in a state-specific manner. We concluded by showing that a sample application to a human clinical dataset prominently identified a known therapeutic target.

Availability: Software implementing the methods for network generation presented in this paper is available for academic use by request from the authors in the form of compiled linux binary executables.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
A. Torkamani and N. J. Schork
Prestige centrality-based functional outlier detection in gene expression analysis
Bioinformatics, September 1, 2009; 25(17): 2222 - 2228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
S. Kim, K.-A. Sohn, and E. P. Xing
A multivariate regression approach to association analysis of a quantitative trait network
Bioinformatics, June 15, 2009; 25(12): i204 - i212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. Wu, A. J. Lusis, and T. A. Drake
A systems-based framework for understanding complex metabolic and cardiovascular disorders
J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2009; 50(Supplement): S358 - S363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
H. Wang, Q. Wang, X. Li, B. Shen, M. Ding, and Z. Shen
Towards patterns tree of gene coexpression in eukaryotic species
Bioinformatics, June 1, 2008; 24(11): 1367 - 1373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
M.-P. Gustin, C. Z. Paultre, J. Randon, G. Bricca, and C. Cerutti
Functional meta-analysis of double connectivity in gene coexpression networks in mammals
Physiol Genomics, June 1, 2008; 34(1): 34 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
S. Gao and X. Wang
TAPPA: topological analysis of pathway phenotype association
Bioinformatics, November 15, 2007; 23(22): 3100 - 3102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
L. L. Elo, H. Jarvenpaa, M. Oresic, R. Lahesmaa, and T. Aittokallio
Systematic construction of gene coexpression networks with applications to human T helper cell differentiation process
Bioinformatics, August 15, 2007; 23(16): 2096 - 2103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. C. Oldham, S. Horvath, and D. H. Geschwind
Conservation and evolution of gene coexpression networks in human and chimpanzee brains
PNAS, November 21, 2006; 103(47): 17973 - 17978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
C.-C. Liu, W.-S. E. Chen, C.-C. Lin, H.-C. Liu, H.-Y. Chen, P.-C. Yang, P.-C. Chang, and J. J.W. Chen
Topology-based cancer classification and related pathway mining using microarray data
Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2006; 34(14): 4069 - 4080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief BioinformHome page
R. Steuer
Review: On the analysis and interpretation of correlations in metabolomic data
Brief Bioinform, June 1, 2006; 7(2): 151 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. F. Petricoin III, V. E. Bichsel, V. S. Calvert, V. Espina, M. Winters, L. Young, C. Belluco, B. J. Trock, M. Lippman, D. A. Fishman, et al.
Mapping Molecular Networks Using Proteomics: A Vision for Patient-Tailored Combination Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2005; 23(15): 3614 - 3621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.