Bioinformatics Advance Access first published online on May 6, 2004
This version published online on July 15, 2004
Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth234
Bioinformatics © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Xpogen, Inc., 1340 Centre Street, Newton Centre, Massachusetts 02459, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: abond{at}xpogen.com.
Motivation: Gene expression data has become an instrumental resource in describing the molecular state associated with various cellular phenotypes and responses to environmental perturbations. The utility of expression profiling has been demonstrated in partitioning clinical states, predicting the class of unknown samples, and in assigning putative functional roles to previously uncharacterized genes based on profile similarity. However, gene expression profiling has had only limited success in identifying therapeutic targets. This is partly due to the fact that current methods based on fold-change focus only on single genes in isolation, and thus cannot convey causal information. In this paper we present a technique for analysis of expression data in a graph-theoretic framework that relies on associations between genes. We describe the global organization of these networks and biological correlates of their structure. We go on to present a novel technique for the molecular characterization of disparate cellular states that adds a new dimension to fold-based methods and conclude with an example application to a human medulloblastoma dataset. Results: We have shown that expression networks generated from large model-organism expression datasets are scale-free and that the average clustering coefficient of these networks is several orders of magnitude higher than would be expected for similarly sized scale-free networks, suggesting an inherent hierarchical modularity similar to that previously identified in other biological networks. Furthermore, we have shown that these properties are robust with respect to the parameters of network construction. We have demonstrated an enrichment of genes having lethal knockout phenotypes in the high-degree (i.e. Hub) nodes in networks generated from aggregate condition datasets; using process-focused S. cerivisiae datasets we have demonstrated additional high-degree enrichments of condition-specific genes encoding proteins known to be involved in or important for the processes interrogated by the microarrays. These results demonstrate the utility of network analysis applied to expression data in identifying genes that are regulated in a state-specific manner. We concluded by showing that a sample application to a human clinical dataset prominently identified a known therapeutic target. Availability: Software implementing the methods for network generation presented in this paper is available for academic use by request from the authors in the form of compiled linux binary executables.
Revised March 18, 2004
Accepted March 19, 2004
Article
Gene expression network topology provides a framework for molecular characterization of cellular state
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Torkamani and N. J. Schork Prestige centrality-based functional outlier detection in gene expression analysis Bioinformatics, September 1, 2009; 25(17): 2222 - 2228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kim, K.-A. Sohn, and E. P. Xing A multivariate regression approach to association analysis of a quantitative trait network Bioinformatics, June 15, 2009; 25(12): i204 - i212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wu, A. J. Lusis, and T. A. Drake A systems-based framework for understanding complex metabolic and cardiovascular disorders J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2009; 50(Supplement): S358 - S363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wang, Q. Wang, X. Li, B. Shen, M. Ding, and Z. Shen Towards patterns tree of gene coexpression in eukaryotic species Bioinformatics, June 1, 2008; 24(11): 1367 - 1373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-P. Gustin, C. Z. Paultre, J. Randon, G. Bricca, and C. Cerutti Functional meta-analysis of double connectivity in gene coexpression networks in mammals Physiol Genomics, June 1, 2008; 34(1): 34 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gao and X. Wang TAPPA: topological analysis of pathway phenotype association Bioinformatics, November 15, 2007; 23(22): 3100 - 3102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Elo, H. Jarvenpaa, M. Oresic, R. Lahesmaa, and T. Aittokallio Systematic construction of gene coexpression networks with applications to human T helper cell differentiation process Bioinformatics, August 15, 2007; 23(16): 2096 - 2103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Oldham, S. Horvath, and D. H. Geschwind Conservation and evolution of gene coexpression networks in human and chimpanzee brains PNAS, November 21, 2006; 103(47): 17973 - 17978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-C. Liu, W.-S. E. Chen, C.-C. Lin, H.-C. Liu, H.-Y. Chen, P.-C. Yang, P.-C. Chang, and J. J.W. Chen Topology-based cancer classification and related pathway mining using microarray data Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2006; 34(14): 4069 - 4080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Steuer Review: On the analysis and interpretation of correlations in metabolomic data Brief Bioinform, June 1, 2006; 7(2): 151 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. F. Petricoin III, V. E. Bichsel, V. S. Calvert, V. Espina, M. Winters, L. Young, C. Belluco, B. J. Trock, M. Lippman, D. A. Fishman, et al. Mapping Molecular Networks Using Proteomics: A Vision for Patient-Tailored Combination Therapy J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2005; 23(15): 3614 - 3621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






