Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on November 25, 2004
Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti156
Bioinformatics © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Computational Modeling and Simulation, Regional Research Laboratory (CSIR), Trivandrum, 695019 India
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Motivation: The operon structure of the prokaryotic genome is a critical input for the reconstruction of regulatory networks at the whole genome level. As experimental methods for detection of operons are difficult and time consuming, efforts are being put into developing computational methods that can use available biological information to predict operons. Method: A genetic algorithm is developed to evolve a starting population of putative operon maps of the genome into progressively better predictions. Fuzzy scoring functions based on multiple criteria are used for assessing the "fitness" of the newly evolved operon maps and guiding their evolution. Results: The algorithm organizes the whole genome into operons. The fuzzy guided genetic algorithm-based approach makes it possible to use diverse biological information like genome sequence data, functional annotations and conservation across multiple genomes, to guide the organization process. This approach does not require any prior training with experimental operons. The predictions from this algorithm for E. coli K12 and B. subtilis are evaluated against experimentally discovered operons for these organisms. The accuracy of the method is evaluated using an ROC analysis. The area under the ROC curve is around 0.9, which indicates excellent accuracy. Supplementary Information: List of predicted operons for E. coli K12 and B. subtilis. The fuzzy rule base for generating fitness scores for putative operons.
Revised October 28, 2004
Accepted November 13, 2004
Article
A fuzzy guided genetic algorithm for operon prediction
2 School of Computer Science, Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, 686560 India
R. Sasikumar, E-mail: roschen_csir{at}rediffmail.com
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. W. W. Brouwer, O. P. Kuipers, and S. A. F. T. van Hijum The relative value of operon predictions Brief Bioinform, September 1, 2008; 9(5): 367 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brilli, R. Fani, and P. Lio Current trends in the bioinformatic sequence analysis of metabolic pathways in prokaryotes Brief Bioinform, January 1, 2008; 9(1): 34 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. T. Tran, P. Dam, Z. Su, F. L. Poole II, M. W. W. Adams, G. T. Zhou, and Y. Xu Operon prediction in Pyrococcus furiosus Nucleic Acids Res., January 12, 2007; 35(1): 11 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Dam, V. Olman, K. Harris, Z. Su, and Y. Xu Operon prediction using both genome-specific and general genomic information Nucleic Acids Res., January 12, 2007; 35(1): 288 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Janga, W. F. Lamboy, A. M. Huerta, and G. Moreno-Hagelsieb The distinctive signatures of promoter regions and operon junctions across prokaryotes Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2006; 34(14): 3980 - 3987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Larranaga, B. Calvo, R. Santana, C. Bielza, J. Galdiano, I. Inza, J. A. Lozano, R. Armananzas, G. Santafe, A. Perez, et al. Machine learning in bioinformatics Brief Bioinform, March 1, 2006; 7(1): 86 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

