Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on November 25, 2004
Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti162
Bioinformatics © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Division of Biometry and Risk Assessment, National Center for Toxicological Research, Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Motivation: Microarray experiments often involve hundreds or thousands of genes. In a typical experiment, only a fraction of genes is expected to be differentially expressed; in addition, the measured intensities among different genes may be correlated. Depending on the experimental objectives, sample size calculations can be based on one of the three specified measures: sensitivity, true discovery, and accuracy rates. Sample size problem is formulated as: the number of arrays needed in order to achieve the desired fraction of the specified measure at the desired family-wise power at the given type I error and (standardized) effect size. Results: We present a general approach for estimating sample size under independent and equally-correlated models using binomial and beta-binomial models, respectively. The sample sizes needed for a two-sample z-test are computed; the computed theoretical numbers agree well with the Monte Carlo simulation results. But, under more general correlation structures, the beta-binomial model can underestimate the needed samples by about 1-5 arrays. * The views presented in this paper are those of authors and not necessarily representing those of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Revised November 16, 2004
Accepted November 17, 2004
Article
Sample size for gene expression microarray experiments*
2 Division of Biometrics II, Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20857
3 Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Unit, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 153 Wallace Tumor Institute, Birmingham, Alabama 35294
James J. Chen, E-mail: jchen{at}nctr.fda.gov
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Oura, S. Matsui, and K. Kawakami Sample size calculations for controlling the distribution of false discovery proportion in microarray experiments Biostat., October 1, 2009; 10(4): 694 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. de Valpine, H.-M. Bitter, M. P. S. Brown, and J. Heller A simulation-approximation approach to sample size planning for high-dimensional classification studies Biostat., July 1, 2009; 10(3): 424 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-S. Lynn, L.-L. Li, Y.-J. Lin, C.-H. Wang, S.-H. Sheng, J.-H. Lin, W. Liao, W.-L. Hsu, and W.-H. Pan A neural network model for constructing endophenotypes of common complex diseases: an application to male young-onset hypertension microarray data Bioinformatics, April 15, 2009; 25(8): 981 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Seo, H. Gordish-Dressman, and E. P. Hoffman An interactive power analysis tool for microarray hypothesis testing and generation Bioinformatics, April 1, 2006; 22(7): 808 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Pounds Estimation and control of multiple testing error rates for microarray studies Brief Bioinform, March 1, 2006; 7(1): 25 - 36. |
||||
![]() |
S. Pounds and C. Cheng Sample size determination for the false discovery rate Bioinformatics, December 1, 2005; 21(23): 4263 - 4271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


