Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on February 2, 2005
Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti302
1 URGV UMR INRA 1165 - CNRS 8114- UEVE, 2 rue Gaston Crémieux, CP 5708, 91057 Evry Cedex, France; UMR INAPG/ENGREF/INRA MIA 518, 16 rue C. Bernard, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Motivation: In cDNA microarray experiments all samples are labeled with either Cy3 or Cy5. Systematic and gene-specific dye bias effects have been observed in dual-color experiments. In contrast to systematic effects which can be corrected by a normalization method, the gene-specific dye bias is not completely suppressed and may alter the conclusions about the differentially expressed genes. Methods: The gene-specific dye-bias is taken into account using an analysis of variance model. We propose an index, named Label Bias Index (LBI), to measure the gene-specific dye bias. It requires at least two self-self hybridization cDNA microarrays. Results: After lowess normalization we have found that the gene-specific dye bias is the major source of experimental variability between replicates. The ratio (R/G) may exceed 2. As a consequence false positive genes may be found in direct comparison without dye-swap. The stability of this artefact and its consequences on gene variance and on direct or indirect comparisons are addressed. Availability: http://www.inapg.inra.fr/ens_rech/mathinfo/recherche/mathematique.
Received July 7, 2004
Revised January 25, 2005
Accepted January 27, 2005
Article
Evaluation of the gene-specific dye bias in cDNA microarray experiments
2 UMR INAPG/ENGREF/INRA MIA 518, 16 rue C. Bernard, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
3 Laboratoire d'Immunologie Virale, Institut Pasteur, 28 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724 Paris
Marie-Laure Martin-Magniette, E-mail: mlmartin{at}inapg.fr
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. S. Sanchez and G. F. V. Glonek Optimal designs for 2-color microarray experiments Biostat., July 1, 2009; 10(3): 561 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S.Q. Kortenhorst, M. Zahurak, S. Shabbeer, S. Kachhap, N. Galloway, G. Parmigiani, H. M.W. Verheul, and M. A. Carducci A Multiple-Loop, Double-Cube Microarray Design Applied to Prostate Cancer Cell Lines with Variable Sensitivity to Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2008; 14(21): 6886 - 6894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kelley, H. Feizi, and T. Ideker Correcting for gene-specific dye bias in DNA microarrays using the method of maximum likelihood Bioinformatics, January 1, 2008; 24(1): 71 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-L. Martin-Magniette, J. Aubert, E. Cabannes, and J.-J. Daudin Answer to the comments of K. Dobbin, J. Shih and R. Simon on the paper 'Evaluation of the gene-specific dye-bias in cDNA microarray experiments' Bioinformatics, July 15, 2005; 21(14): 3065 - 3065. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


