Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on September 13, 2005
Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti669
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Biology, Higgins 355, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA; Department of Computer Science (courtesy appt.), Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Motivation: A k-point mutant of a given RNA sequence s = s1, ..., sn is an RNA sequence s' = s'1, ..., s'n obtained by mutating exactly k-positions in s; i.e. Hamming distance between s and s' equals k. To understand the effect of pointwise mutation in RNA (Schuster et al., 1994; Clote et al., 2005b), we consider the distribution of energies of all secondary structures of k-point mutants of a given RNA sequence. Results: Here we describe a novel algorithm to compute the mean and standard deviation of energies of all secondary structures of k-point mutants of a given RNA sequence. We then focus on the tail of the energy distribution, and compute, using the algorithm AMSAG (Waldispühl et al., 2002), the k-superoptimal structure; i.e. the secondary structure of a Webserver: http://clavius.bc.edu/~clotelab/RNAmutants/.
Received June 7, 2005
Revised September 6, 2005
Accepted September 7, 2005
Article
Energy landscape of k-point mutants of an RNA molecule
,
2 Department of Biology, Higgins 355, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA; LIX, Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau Cedex, FRANCE; LIAFA, Université Denis Diderot, 2 place Jussieu, 75251 Paris Cedex, FRANCE
3 LIX, Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau Cedex, FRANCE
P. Clote, E-mail: clote{at}bc.edu
![]()
Abstract
k-point mutant having least free energy over all secondary structures of all k'-point mutants of a given RNA sequence, for k'
k. Evidence is presented that the k-superoptimal secondary structure is often closer, as measured by base pair distance, and two additional distance measures, to the secondary structure derived by comparative sequence analysis than is the Zuker (Zuker and Stiegler, 1981; Zuker, 2003) minimum free energy structure of the original (wild-type or unmutated) RNA.
Corresponding author: waldispu@lix.polytechnique.fr
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Waldispuhl, S. Devadas, B. Berger, and P. Clote RNAmutants: a web server to explore the mutational landscape of RNA secondary structures Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2009; 37(suppl_2): W281 - W286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. DING Statistical and Bayesian approaches to RNA secondary structure prediction. RNA, March 1, 2006; 12(3): 323 - 331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

