Bioinformatics Advance Access first published online on September 13, 2005
This version published online on September 14, 2005
Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti677
1 Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Motivation: Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) allows detection and mapping of copy number of DNA segments. A challenge is to make inferences about the copy number structure of the genome. Several statistical methods have been proposed to determine genomic segments with different copy number levels. However, to date, no comprehensive comparison of various characteristics of these methods exists. Moreover, the segmentation results have not been utilized in downstream analyses. Results: We describe a comparison study of three popular and publicly available methods for the analysis of array CGH data and we demonstrate how segmentation results may be utilized in the downstream analyses such as testing and classification, yielding higher power and prediction accuracy. Since the methods operate on individual chromosomes, we also propose a novel procedure for merging segments across the genome, resulting in an interpretable set of copy number levels, and thus facilitating identification of copy number alterations in each genome. Availability: http://www.bioconductor.org. Supplementary Information: http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/~hanni/aCGH/.
Received July 5, 2005
Revised September 8, 2005
Accepted September 8, 2005
Article
A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses
2 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
Jane Fridlyand, E-mail: jfridlyand{at}cc.ucsf.edu
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Bengtsson, P. Wirapati, and T. P. Speed A single-array preprocessing method for estimating full-resolution raw copy numbers from all Affymetrix genotyping arrays including GenomeWideSNP 5 & 6 Bioinformatics, September 1, 2009; 25(17): 2149 - 2156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. M. Rueda and R. Diaz-Uriarte RJaCGH: Bayesian analysis of aCGH arrays for detecting copy number changes and recurrent regions Bioinformatics, August 1, 2009; 25(15): 1959 - 1960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Daines, H. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Han, R. Gibbs, and R. Chen High-Throughput Multiplex Sequencing to Discover Copy Number Variants in Drosophila Genetics, August 1, 2009; 182(4): 935 - 941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Y. Wu, H. A. Chipman, S. B. Bull, L. Briollais, and K. Wang A Bayesian segmentation approach to ascertain copy number variations at the population level Bioinformatics, July 1, 2009; 25(13): 1669 - 1679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Postma, M. Koopman, T. E. Buffart, P. P. Eijk, B. Carvalho, G. J. Peters, B. Ylstra, J. H. van Krieken, C. J. A. Punt, and G. A. Meijer DNA copy number profiles of primary tumors as predictors of response to chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer Ann. Onc., June 1, 2009; 20(6): 1048 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Pique-Regi, A. Ortega, and S. Asgharzadeh Joint estimation of copy number variation and reference intensities on multiple DNA arrays using GADA Bioinformatics, May 15, 2009; 25(10): 1223 - 1230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Budinska, E. Gelnarova, and M. G. Schimek MSMAD: a computationally efficient method for the analysis of noisy array CGH data Bioinformatics, March 15, 2009; 25(6): 703 - 713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-A. Chen, H.-F. Liu, and K.-M. Chao CNVDetector: locating copy number variations using array CGH data Bioinformatics, December 1, 2008; 24(23): 2773 - 2775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-I H. Chen, F.-H. Hsu, Y. Jiang, M.-H. Tsai, P.-C. Yang, P. S. Meltzer, E. Y. Chuang, and Y. Chen A probe-density-based analysis method for array CGH data: simulation, normalization and centralization Bioinformatics, August 15, 2008; 24(16): 1749 - 1756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ben-Yaacov and Y. C. Eldar A fast and flexible method for the segmentation of aCGH data Bioinformatics, August 15, 2008; 24(16): i139 - i145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. V. Iakovlev, N. C.R. Arneson, V. Wong, C. Wang, S. Leung, G. Iakovleva, K. Warren, M. Pintilie, and S. J. Done Genomic Differences Between Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast and that Associated with Invasive Disease: a Calibrated aCGH Study Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 14(14): 4446 - 4454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. N. Van Wieringen, M. A. Van De Wiel, and B. Ylstra Weighted clustering of called array CGH data Biostat., July 1, 2008; 9(3): 484 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Cahan, L. E. Godfrey, P. S. Eis, T. A. Richmond, R. R. Selzer, M. Brent, H. L. McLeod, T. J. Ley, and T. A. Graubert wuHMM: a robust algorithm to detect DNA copy number variation using long oligonucleotide microarray data Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2008; 36(7): e41 - e41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Lai, H. Xing, and N. Zhang Stochastic segmentation models for array-based comparative genomic hybridization data analysis Biostat., April 1, 2008; 9(2): 290 - 307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Lai, V. Choudhary, and P. J. Park CGHweb: a tool for comparing DNA copy number segmentations from multiple algorithms Bioinformatics, April 1, 2008; 24(7): 1014 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Andersson, C. E. G. Bruder, A. Piotrowski, U. Menzel, H. Nord, J. Sandgren, T. R. Hvidsten, T. Diaz de Stahl, J. P. Dumanski, and J. Komorowski A segmental maximum a posteriori approach to genome-wide copy number profiling Bioinformatics, March 15, 2008; 24(6): 751 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Klijn, H. Holstege, J. de Ridder, X. Liu, M. Reinders, J. Jonkers, and L. Wessels Identification of cancer genes using a statistical framework for multiexperiment analysis of nondiscretized array CGH data Nucleic Acids Res., February 2, 2008; 36(2): e13 - e13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Pique-Regi, J. Monso-Varona, A. Ortega, R. C. Seeger, T. J. Triche, and S. Asgharzadeh Sparse representation and Bayesian detection of genome copy number alterations from microarray data Bioinformatics, February 1, 2008; 24(3): 309 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Huang, A. Gusnanto, K. O'Sullivan, J. Staaf, A. Borg, and Y. Pawitan Robust smooth segmentation approach for array CGH data analysis Bioinformatics, September 15, 2007; 23(18): 2463 - 2469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Diaz-Uriarte, A. Alibes, E. R. Morrissey, A. Canada, O. M. Rueda, and M. L. Neves Asterias: integrated analysis of expression and aCGH data using an open-source, web-based, parallelized software suite Nucleic Acids Res., July 13, 2007; 35(suppl_2): W75 - W80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Xing, C. M. T. Greenwood, and S. B. Bull A hierarchical clustering method for estimating copy number variation Biostat., July 1, 2007; 8(3): 632 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. O. Korbel, A. E. Urban, F. Grubert, J. Du, T. E. Royce, P. Starr, G. Zhong, B. S. Emanuel, S. M. Weissman, M. Snyder, et al. Systematic prediction and validation of breakpoints associated with copy-number variants in the human genome PNAS, June 12, 2007; 104(24): 10110 - 10115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. van de Wiel, K. I. Kim, S. J. Vosse, W. N. van Wieringen, S. M. Wilting, and B. Ylstra CGHcall: calling aberrations for array CGH tumor profiles Bioinformatics, April 1, 2007; 23(7): 892 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Venkatraman and A. B. Olshen A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data Bioinformatics, March 15, 2007; 23(6): 657 - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Liu, S. Ranka, and T. Kahveci Markers improve clustering of CGH data Bioinformatics, February 15, 2007; 23(4): 450 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Willenbrock, A. Petersen, C. Sekse, K. Kiil, Y. Wasteson, and D. W. Ussery Design of a Seven-Genome Escherichia coli Microarray for Comparative Genomic Profiling J. Bacteriol., November 15, 2006; 188(22): 7713 - 7721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Trautmann, J. P. Terdiman, A. J. French, R. Roydasgupta, N. Sein, S. Kakar, J. Fridlyand, A. M. Snijders, D. G. Albertson, S. N. Thibodeau, et al. Chromosomal Instability in Microsatellite-Unstable and Stable Colon Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 12(21): 6379 - 6385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kotliarov, M. E. Steed, N. Christopher, J. Walling, Q. Su, A. Center, J. Heiss, M. Rosenblum, T. Mikkelsen, J. C. Zenklusen, et al. High-resolution Global Genomic Survey of 178 Gliomas Reveals Novel Regions of Copy Number Alteration and Allelic Imbalances Cancer Res., October 1, 2006; 66(19): 9428 - 9436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Liu, J. Mohammed, J. Carter, S. Ranka, T. Kahveci, and M. Baudis Distance-based clustering of CGH data Bioinformatics, August 15, 2006; 22(16): 1971 - 1978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Engler, G. Mohapatra, D. N. Louis, and R. A. Betensky A pseudolikelihood approach for simultaneous analysis of array comparative genomic hybridizations Biostat., July 1, 2006; 7(3): 399 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Marioni, N. P. Thorne, and S. Tavare BioHMM: a heterogeneous hidden Markov model for segmenting array CGH data Bioinformatics, May 1, 2006; 22(9): 1144 - 1146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. van den IJssel, M. Tijssen, S.-F. Chin, P. Eijk, B. Carvalho, E. Hopmans, H. Holstege, D. K. Bangarusamy, J. Jonkers, G. A. Meijer, et al. Human and mouse oligonucleotide-based array CGH Nucleic Acids Res., December 16, 2005; 33(22): e192 - e192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||








