Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on December 20, 2005
Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btk013
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Motivation: The false discovery rate (fdr) is a key tool for statistical assessment of differential expression (DE) in microarray studies. Overall control of the fdr alone, however, is not sufficient to address the problem of genes with small variance, which generally suffer from a disproportional high rate of false positives. It is desirable to have an fdr-controlling procedure that automatically accounts for gene variability. Methods: We generalize the local fdr as a function of multiple statistics, combining a common test statistic for assessing differential expression with its standard error information. We use a nonparametric mixture model for DE and nonDE genes to describe the observed multi-dimensional statistics, and estimate the distribution for nonDE genes via the permutation method. We demonstrate this fdr2d approach for simulated and real microarray data. Results: The fdr2d allows objective assessment of differential expression as a function of gene variability. We also show that the fdr2d performs better than commonly-used modified test statistics. Availability: An R-package OCplus containing functions for computing fdr2d() and other operating characteristics of microarray data is available at http://www.meb.ki.se/~yudpaw.
Received August 29, 2005
Revised December 14, 2005
Accepted December 15, 2005
Article
Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies
Alexander Ploner 1 *,
Stefano Calza 2,
Arief Gusnanto 3,
and
Yudi Pawitan 1
2 Dip. di Scienze Biomediche e Biotecnologie, Università degli Studi di Brescia, 11 25123 Brescia, Italy
3 MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2 2SR, United Kingdom
Alexander Ploner, E-mail: alexander.ploner{at}meb.ki.se
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W.-J. Hong, R. Tibshirani, and G. Chu Local false discovery rate facilitates comparison of different microarray experiments Nucleic Acids Res., October 13, 2009; (2009) gkp813v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bukszar, J. L. McClay, and E. J. C. G. van den Oord Estimating the posterior probability that genome-wide association findings are true or false Bioinformatics, July 15, 2009; 25(14): 1807 - 1813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Watkins, A. Gusnanto, B. de Bono, S. De, D. Miranda-Saavedra, D. L. Hardie, W. G. J. Angenent, A. P. Attwood, P. D. Ellis, W. Erber, et al. A HaemAtlas: characterizing gene expression in differentiated human blood cells Blood, May 7, 2009; 113(19): e1 - e9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Demissie, B. Mascialino, S. Calza, and Y. Pawitan Unequal group variances in microarray data analyses Bioinformatics, May 1, 2008; 24(9): 1168 - 1174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Saeys, I. Inza, and P. Larranaga A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics Bioinformatics, October 1, 2007; 23(19): 2507 - 2517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Calza, W. Raffelsberger, A. Ploner, J. Sahel, T. Leveillard, and Y. Pawitan Filtering genes to improve sensitivity in oligonucleotide microarray data analysis Nucleic Acids Res., August 28, 2007; (2007) gkm537v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.J. McLachlan, R.W. Bean, and L. B.-T. Jones A simple implementation of a normal mixture approach to differential gene expression in multiclass microarrays Bioinformatics, July 1, 2006; 22(13): 1608 - 1615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


