Skip Navigation



Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on January 12, 2006

Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btk044
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
22/7/857    most recent
btk044v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shah, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Bork, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shah, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Bork, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2006). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Received October 20, 2005
Revised December 9, 2005
Accepted January 5, 2006

Article

LSAT: learning about alternative transcripts in MEDLINE

Parantu K. Shah 1 * and Peer Bork 1

1 European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany; Max Delbrück Centre for Molecular Medicine, Berlin-Buch, Germany

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Parantu K. Shah, E-mail: shah{at}embl.de


   Abstract

Motivation: Generation of alternative transcripts from the same gene in is an important biological event due to their contribution in creating functional diversity in eukaryotes. In this work, we choose the task of extracting information around this complex topic using a two step procedure involving machine learning and information extraction.

Results: In the first step, we trained a classifier that inductively learns to identify sentences about physiological transcript diversity from the MEDLINE abstracts. Using a large hand-built corpus, we compared the sentence classification performance of various text categorization methods. Support vector machines (SVM) followed by the maximum entropy classifier outperformed other methods for the sentence classification task. The SVM with the radial basis function kernel and optimized parameters achieved F{beta}-measure of 91% during the four-fold cross validation and of 74% when applied to all sentences in more than 12 million abstracts of MEDLINE. In the second step, we identified eight frequently present semantic categories in the sentences and performed a limited amount of semantic role labeling. The role labeling step also achieved very high F{beta}-measure for all eight categories.

Availability: The results of our two-step procedure are summarized in the LSAT database of alternative transcripts. LSAT is available at http://www.bork.embl.de/LSAT/.


Associate Editor: Chris Stoeckert
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.