Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on September 5, 2006
Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl469
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 ETH Zurich, Bioprocess Laboratory, Institute of Process Engineering, Universitätsstrasse 6, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland; New address: ETH Zurich, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, Wolfgang-Pauli-Str. 16, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Synthetic biology is interpreted as the engineering-driven building of increasingly complex biological entities for novel applications. Encouraged by progress in the design of artificial gene networks, de novo DNA synthesis and protein engineering, we review the case for this emerging discipline. Key aspects of an engineering approach are purpose-orientation, deep insight into the underlying scientific principles, a hierarchy of abstraction including suitable interfaces between and within the levels of the hierarchy, standardization, and the separation of design and fabrication. Synthetic biology investigates possibilities to implement these requirements into the process of engineering biological systems. This is illustrated on the DNA level by the implementation of engineering-inspired artificial operations such as toggle switching, oscillating, or production of spatial patterns. On the protein level, the functionally self-contained domain structure of a number of proteins suggests possibilities for essentially Lego-like recombination which can be exploited for reprogramming DNA binding domain specificities or signaling pathways. Alternatively, computational design emerges to rationally reprogram enzyme function. Finally, the increasing facility of de novo DNA synthesis - synthetic biology's system fabrication process - supplies the possibility to implement novel designs for ever more complex systems. Some of these elements have merged to realize the first tangible synthetic biology applications in the area of manufacturing of pharmaceutical compounds.
Received April 23, 2006
Revised August 29, 2006
Accepted August 29, 2006
Review
Synthetic biology - putting engineering into biology
Matthias Heinemann 1 and Sven Panke 2 *
2 ETH Zurich, Bioprocess Laboratory, Institute of Process Engineering, Universitätsstrasse 6, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Sven Panke, E-mail: panke{at}ipe.mavt.ethz.ch
![]()
Abstract
Associate Editor: Jonathan Wren
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Welch, A. Villalobos, C. Gustafsson, and J. Minshull You're one in a googol: optimizing genes for protein expression J R Soc Interface, August 6, 2009; 6(Suppl_4): S467 - S476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Gulati, V. Rouilly, X. Niu, J. Chappell, R. I. Kitney, J. B. Edel, P. S. Freemont, and A. J. deMello Opportunities for microfluidic technologies in synthetic biology J R Soc Interface, August 6, 2009; 6(Suppl_4): S493 - S506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.-S. Chen, C.-H. Chang, and H.-C. Lee Robust synthetic biology design: stochastic game theory approach Bioinformatics, July 15, 2009; 25(14): 1822 - 1830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hofmann-Apitius, J. Fluck, L. Furlong, O. Fornes, C. Kolarik, S. Hanser, M. Boeker, S. Schulz, F. Sanz, R. Klinger, et al. Knowledge environments representing molecular entities for the virtual physiological human Phil Trans R Soc A, September 13, 2008; 366(1878): 3091 - 3110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Cai, B. Hartnett, C. Gustafsson, and J. Peccoud A syntactic model to design and verify synthetic genetic constructs derived from standard biological parts Bioinformatics, October 15, 2007; 23(20): 2760 - 2767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


