Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on September 5, 2006
Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl472
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Department of Computer Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology
* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Motivation: The maximum expected accuracy optimization criterion for multiple sequence alignment uses pairwise posterior probabilities of residues to align sequences. The partition function methodology is one way of estimating these probabilities. Here, we combine these two ideas for the first time to construct maximal expected accuracy sequence alignments. Results: We bridge the two techniques within the program Probalign. Our results indicate that Probalign alignments are generally more accurate than other leading multiple sequence alignment methods (i.e., Probcons, MAFFT, and MUSCLE) on the BAliBASE 3.0 protein alignment benchmark. Similarly, Probalign also outperforms these methods on the HOMSTRAD and OXBENCH benchmarks. Probalign ranks statistically significantly highest (P-value < 0.005) on all three benchmarks. Deeper scrutiny of the technique indicates that the improvements are largest on datasets containing N/C terminal extensions and on datasets containing long and heterogeneous length proteins. These points are demonstrated on both real and simulated data. Finally, our method also produces accurate alignments on long and heterogeneous length datasets containing protein repeats. There, alignment accuracy scores are at least 10% and 15% higher than the other three methods when standard deviation of length is at least 300 and 400 respectively. Availability: Open source code implementing Probalign as well as for producing the simulated data, and all real and simulated data are freely available from http://www.cs.njit.edu/usman/probalign.
Received July 27, 2006
Accepted September 1, 2006
Article
Probalign: multiple sequence alignment using partition function posterior probabilities
Usman Roshan 1 * and Dennis R. Livesay 2
2 Department of Computer Science and Bioinformatics Research Center, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Usman Roshan, E-mail: usman{at}cs.njit.edu
![]()
Abstract
Associate Editor: Alex Bateman
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Lefebure and M. J. Stanhope Pervasive, genome-wide positive selection leading to functional divergence in the bacterial genus Campylobacter Genome Res., July 1, 2009; 19(7): 1224 - 1232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hamada, K. Sato, H. Kiryu, T. Mituyama, and K. Asai Predictions of RNA secondary structure by combining homologous sequence information Bioinformatics, June 15, 2009; 25(12): i330 - i338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Lu and S.-H. Sze Improving accuracy of multiple sequence alignment algorithms based on alignment of neighboring residues Nucleic Acids Res., February 1, 2009; 37(2): 463 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Katoh and H. Toh Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program Brief Bioinform, July 1, 2008; 9(4): 286 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Lunter, A. Rocco, N. Mimouni, A. Heger, A. Caldeira, and J. Hein Uncertainty in homology inferences: Assessing and improving genomic sequence alignment Genome Res., February 1, 2008; 18(2): 298 - 309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chikkagoudar, U. Roshan, and D. Livesay eProbalign: generation and manipulation of multiple sequence alignments using partition function posterior probabilities Nucleic Acids Res., July 13, 2007; 35(suppl_2): W675 - W677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



