Skip Navigation



Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on October 11, 2006
Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl521
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
22/24/3032    most recent
btl521v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seoighe, C.
Right arrow Articles by Scheffler, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seoighe, C.
Right arrow Articles by Scheffler, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2006 The Author(s)
Received August 18, 2006
Revised September 26, 2006
Accepted October 6, 2006

Article

Maximum likelihood inference of imprinting and allele-specific expression from EST data

Cathal Seoighe 1 *, Victoria Nembaware 1, and Konrad Scheffler 1

1 Computational Biology Group, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, South Africa

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cathal Seoighe, E-mail: cathal{at}science.uct.ac.za


  Abstract

Motivation: In a diploid organism the proportion of transcripts that are produced from the two parental alleles can differ substantially due, for example, to epigenetic modification that causes complete or partial silencing of one parental allele or to cis acting polymorphisms that affect transcriptional regulation. Counts of SNP alleles derived from EST sequences have been used to identify both novel candidates for genomic imprinting as well as examples of genes with allelic differences in expression.

Results: We have developed a set of statistical models in a maximum likelihood framework that can make highly efficient use of public transcript data to identify genes with unequal representation of alternative alleles in cDNA libraries. We modelled both imprinting and allele-specific expression and applied the models to a large dataset of SNPs mapped to EST sequences. Using simulations, matched closely to real data, we demonstrate significantly improved performance over existing methods that have been applied to the same data. We further validated the power of this approach to detect imprinting using a set of known imprinted genes and inferred a set of candidate imprinted genes, several of which are in close proximity to known imprinted genes. We report evidence that there are undiscovered imprinted genes in known imprinted regions. Overall, more than half of the genes for which the most data are available show some evidence of allele-specific expression.

Availability: Software is available from the authors on request.

Supplementary information: http://cbio.uct.ac.za/publication_support/ML_EST.

Associate Editor: John Quackenbush
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Genome ResHome page
D. Monk, A. Wagschal, P. Arnaud, P.-S. Muller, L. Parker-Katiraee, D. Bourc'his, S. W. Scherer, R. Feil, P. Stanier, and G. E. Moore
Comparative analysis of human chromosome 7q21 and mouse proximal chromosome 6 reveals a placental-specific imprinted gene, TFPI2/Tfpi2, which requires EHMT2 and EED for allelic-silencing
Genome Res., August 1, 2008; 18(8): 1270 - 1281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.