Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on February 3, 2007
Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm033
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DiseaseSpecific Genomic Analysis: Identifying the Signature of Pathologic Biology
aDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, b Department of Mathematics, cDepartment of Health, Research & Policy, and dDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, eDepartment of Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Center, Oslo, Norway, fMedical Faculty, University of Oslo, Norway.
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Dr. Stefanie Jeffrey, E-mail: ssj{at}stanford.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
Motivation: Genomic high-throughput technology generates massive data, providing opportunities to understand countless facets of the functioning genome. It also raises profound issues in identifying data relevant to the biology being studied.
Results: We introduce a method for the analysis of pathologic biology that unravels the disease characteristics of high dimensional data. The method, Disease-Specific Genomic Analysis (DSGA), is intended to precede standard techniques like clustering or class prediction, and enhance their performance and ability to detect disease. DSGA measures the extent to which the disease deviates from a continuous range of normal phenotypes, and isolates the aberrant component of data. In several microarray cancer datasets, we show that DSGA outperforms standard methods. We then use DSGA to highlight a novel subdivision of an important class of genes in breast cancer, the Estrogen Receptor cluster. We also identify new markers distinguishing ductal and lobular breast cancers. Although our examples focus on microarrays, DSGA generalizes to any high dimensional genomic/proteomic data.
Associate Editor: Dr. Joaquin Dopazo
Received on May 9, 2006; revised on December 22, 2006; accepted on January 28, 2007
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. A. Teicher In Vivo/Ex Vivo and In Situ Assays Used in Cancer Research: A Brief Review Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2009; 37(1): 114 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Teicher Newer Cytotoxic Agents: Attacking Cancer Broadly Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2008; 14(6): 1610 - 1617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang, D. M. Ikeda, B. Narasimhan, T. A. Longacre, R. J. Bleicher, S. Pal, R. J. Jackman, and S. S. Jeffrey Estrogen Receptor-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer: Imaging Features of Tumors with and without Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Type 2 Overexpression Radiology, February 1, 2008; 246(2): 367 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


