Skip Navigation



Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on July 10, 2007
Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm347
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/1/71    most recent
btm347v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelley, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ideker, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelley, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ideker, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Correcting for gene-specific dye bias in DNA microarrays using the method of maximum likelihood

Ryan Kelley 1,*, Hoda Feizi 2 and Trey Ideker 2

1Program in Bioinformatics, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0412
2Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0412

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Ryan Kelley, E-mail: rmkelley{at}ucsd.edu


  Abstract

Motivation:In two-color microarray experiments, well known differences exist in the labeling and hybridization efficiency of Cy3 and Cy5 dyes. Previous reports have revealed that these differences can vary on a gene-by-gene basis, an effect termed gene-specific dye bias. If uncorrected, this bias can influence the determination of differentially expressed genes.

Results:We show that the magnitude of the bias scales multiplicatively with signal intensity and is dependent on which nucleotide has been conjugated to the fluorescent dye. A method is proposed to account for gene-specific dye bias within a maximum likelihood error modeling framework. Using two different labeling schemes, we show that correcting for gene-specific dye bias results in the superior identification of differentially expressed genes within this framework. Improvement is also possible in related ANOVA approaches.

Availability:A software implementation of this procedure is freely available at http://cellcircuits.org/VERA.

Contact: rmkelley{at}ucsd.edu

Associate Editor: Dr. Joaquin Dopazo

Received on October 22, 2006; revised on June 21, 2007; accepted on June 27, 2007

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Physiol. GenomicsHome page
T. J. Chu and D. G. Peters
Serial analysis of the vascular endothelial transcriptome under static and shear stress conditions
Physiol Genomics, July 1, 2008; 34(2): 185 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.