Skip Navigation



Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on November 15, 2007
Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm558
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/2/265    most recent
btm558v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, D.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Gaining confidence in biological interpretation of the microarray data: the functional consistence of the significant GO categories

Da Yang 1, Yanhui Li 2, Hui Xiao 1, Qing Liu 1, Min Zhang 1, Jing Zhu 2, Wencai Ma 1, Chen Yao 1, Jing Wang 1, Dong Wang 1, Zheng Guo 1,2,* and Baofeng Yang 1

1 Department of Bioinformatics, Bio-pharmaceutical Key Laboratory of Heilongjiang Province-Incubator of State Key Laboratory, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, China
2 Bioinformatics Centre and School of Life Science, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610054, China

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Prof. Zheng Guo, E-mail: guoz{at}ems.hrbmu.edu.cn


  Abstract

Motivation: In microarray studies, numerous tools are available for functional enrichment analysis based on GO categories. Most of these tools, due to their requirement of a prior threshold for designating genes as differentially expressed genes (DEGs), are categorized as threshold-dependent methods which often suffer from a major criticism on their changing results with different thresholds.

Results: In the present paper, by considering the inherent correlation structure of the GO categories, a continuous measure based on semantic similarity of GO categories is proposed to investigate the functional consistence (or stability) of threshold-dependent methods. The results from several datasets show when simply counting overlapping categories between two groups, the significant category groups selected under different DEG thresholds are seemingly very different. However, based on the semantic similarity measure proposed in this paper, the results are rather functionally consistent for a wide range of DEG thresholds. Moreover, we find that the functional consistence of gene lists ranked by SAM metric behaves relatively robust against changing DEG thresholds.

Availability: Source code in R is available on request from the authors.

Contact: guoz{at}ems.hrbmu.edu.cn, yangbf{at}ems.hrbmu.edu.cn

Associate Editor: Prof. Martin Bishop

Da Yang, YanHui Li, Hui Xiao contribute equally to this work

Received on July 21, 2007; revised on November 3, 2007; accepted on November 4, 2007

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BioinformaticsHome page
M. Zhang, C. Yao, Z. Guo, J. Zou, L. Zhang, H. Xiao, D. Wang, D. Yang, X. Gong, J. Zhu, et al.
Apparently low reproducibility of true differential expression discoveries in microarray studies
Bioinformatics, September 15, 2008; 24(18): 2057 - 2063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.