Skip Navigation



Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on March 4, 2008

Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn084
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/8/1049    most recent
btn084v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kliger, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Olshansky, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kliger, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Olshansky, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2008). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Predicting Proteolytic Sites in Extracellular Proteins: Only Halfway There

Yossef Kliger 1,*,# , Eyal Gofer 1,# , Assaf Wool 1, Amir Toporik 1, Avihay Apatoff 1,2 and Moshe Olshansky 1

1Compugen Ltd, 72 Pinchas Rosen, Tel Aviv 69512, Israel.
2 The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Dr. Yossef Kliger, E-mail: kliger{at}compugen.co.il


   Abstract

Motivation: Many secretory proteins are synthesized as inactive precursors that must undergo post-translational proteolysis in order to mature and become active. In the current study, we address the challenge of sequence-based discovery of proteolytic sites in secreted proteins using machine learning.

Results: The results revealed that only half of the extra-cellular proteolytic sites are currently annotated, leaving over 3600 unannotated ones. Furthermore, we have found that only 6% of the unannotated sites are similar to known proteolytic sites, whereas the remaining 94% do not share significant similarity with any annotated proteolytic site. The computational challenges in these two cases are very different. While the precision in detecting the former group is close to perfect, only a mere 22% of the latter group were detected with a precision of 80%. The applicability of the classifier is demonstrated through members of the FGF family, in which we verified the conservation of physiologically-relevant proteolytic sites in homologous proteins.

Contact: kliger{at}compugen.co.il

Associate Editor: Prof. John Quackenbush

# Equally contributed to this paper.


Received on December 13, 2008; revised on February 10, 2008; accepted on March 1, 2008

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Shemesh, A. Toporik, Z. Levine, I. Hecht, G. Rotman, A. Wool, D. Dahary, E. Gofer, Y. Kliger, M. A. Soffer, et al.
Discovery and Validation of Novel Peptide Agonists for G-protein-coupled Receptors
J. Biol. Chem., December 12, 2008; 283(50): 34643 - 34649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.