Skip Navigation



Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on March 14, 2008
Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn100
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
24/9/1168    most recent
btn100v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Demissie, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pawitan, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Demissie, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pawitan, Y.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2008). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Unequal group variances in microarray data analyses

Meaza Demissie 1, Barbara Mascialino 2, Stefano Calza 3 and Yudi Pawitan 2

1 Department of Statistics, University of Örebro, Sweden; 2Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; 3Department of Biomedical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Brescia, Italy

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Prof. Yudi Pawitan, E-mail: yudi.pawitan{at}ki.se


  Abstract

Motivation: In searching for differentially expressed (DE) genes in microarray data, we often observe a fraction of the genes to have unequal variability between groups. This is not an issue in large samples, where a valid test exists that uses individual variances separately. The problem arises in the small-sample setting, where the approximately-valid Welch test lacks sensitivity, while the more sensitive moderated t test assumes equal variance.

Methods: We introduce a moderated Welch test (MWT) that allows nequal variance between groups. It is based on (i) weighting of pooled and unpooled standard errors and (ii) improved estimation of the gene-level variance that exploits the information from across the genes.

Results: When a nontrivial proportion of genes has unequal variability, FDR estimates based on the standard t and moderated t tests are often too optimistic, while the standard Welch test has low sensitivity. The MWT is shown to (i) perform better than the standard t, the standard Welch and the moderated t tests when the variances are unequal between groups, and (ii) perform similarly to the moderated t, and better than the standard t andWelch tests when the group variances are equal. These results mean that MWT is more reliable than other existing tests over wider range of data conditions.

Availability: R package to perform MWT is available at http://www.meb.ki.se/~yudpaw

Contact: yudi.pawitan{at}ki.se

Associate Editor: Prof. Martin Bishop

Received on January 21, 2008; revised on February 23, 2008; accepted on March 12, 2008

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.