Bioinformatics Advance Access first published online on March 20, 2008
This version published online on March 24, 2008
Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn102
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scaffolding and validation of bacterial genome assemblies using optical restriction maps
1University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
2Biological Defense Research Directorate, Naval Medical Research Center and Henry M. Jackson Foundation, 12300 Washington Ave, Rockville, MD 20852, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Dr. Mihai Pop, E-mail: mpop{at}umiacs.umd.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
Motivation: New, high-throughput sequencing technologies have made it feasible to cheaply generate vast amounts of sequence information from a genome of interest. The computational reconstruction of the complete sequence of a genome is complicated by specific features of these new sequencing technologies, such as the short length of the sequencing reads and absence of mate-pair information. In this paper we propose methods to overcome such limitations by incorportating information from optical restriction maps.
Results: We demonstrate the robustness of our methods to sequencing and assemby errors using extensive experiments on simulated datasets. We then present the results obtained by applying our algorithms to data generated from two bacterial genomes Yersinia aldovae and Yersinia kristensenii. The resulting assemblies contain a single scaffold covering a large fraction of the respective genomes, suggesting that the careful use of optical maps can provide a cost-effective framework for the assembly of genomes.
Availability: The tools described here are available as an opensource package at ftp://ftp.cbcb.umd.edu/pub/software/soma
Contact: mpop{at}umiacs.umd.edu
Associate Editor: Prof. Alfonso Valencia
Received on January 21, 2008; revised on February 19, 2008; accepted on March 6, 2008
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Pop Genome assembly reborn: recent computational challenges Brief Bioinform, July 1, 2009; 10(4): 354 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
