Skip Navigation



Bioinformatics Advance Access published online on January 28, 2009

Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp007
This Article
Right arrow Advance Access manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
25/5/636    most recent
btp007v1
Right arrow Comments: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rajaram, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rajaram, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author (2009). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

A novel meta-analysis method exploiting consistency of high-throughput experiments

Satwik Rajaram

Department of Physics,1110 W. Green Street, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana,IL 61801-3080, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Mr. Satwik Rajaram, E-mail: srajaram{at}uiuc.edu


   Abstract

Motivation: Motivation: Large-scale biological experiments provide snapshots into the huge number of processes running in parallel within the organism. These processes depend on a large number of (hidden) (epi)genetic, social, environmental and other factors that are out of experimentalists' control. This makes it extremely dif.cult to identify the dominant processes and the elements involved in them based on a single experiment. It is therefore desirable to use multiple sets of experiments targeting the same phenomena while differing in some experimental parameters (hidden or controllable). Although such datasets are becoming increasingly common, their analysis is complicated by the fact that the various biological elements could be in.uenced by different sets of factors.

Results: The central hypothesis of this article is that biologically related elements and processes are affected by changes in similar ways while unrelated ones are affected differently. Thus, the relations between related elements are more consistent across experiments. The method outlined here looks for groups of elements with robust intra-group relationships in the expectation that they are related. The major groups of elements may be identi.ed in this way. The strengths of relationships per se are not valued, just their consistency. This represents a completely novel and unutilized source of information. In the analysis of time course microarray experiments, I found cell cycle- and ribosome-related genes to be the major groups. Despite not looking for these groups in particular, the identi.cation of these genes rivals that of methods designed speci.cally for this purpose.

Availability: A C++ implementation is available at http://www.rinst. org/ICS/ICS_Programs.tar.gz.

Contact: srajaram{at}uiuc.edu

Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Associate Editor: Dr. Joaquin Dopazo


Received on August 6, 2008; revised on November 2, 2008; accepted on January 1, 2009

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.